Date: Sat, 2 Jan 2021 09:50:45 -0700 From: Warner Losh <imp@bsdimp.com> To: Graham Perrin <grahamperrin@gmail.com> Cc: FreeBSD CURRENT <freebsd-current@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: etcupdate, svnlite, documentation etc. following the transition of source to Git Message-ID: <CANCZdfr10vYTZUEYzQtooBWuSZwksh%2BS3qBs5fHbiXmp6ed6wg@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <1d6c0954-ca13-b3a0-3e82-c79df594e357@gmail.com> References: <c8ed98ef-8324-5a3a-b4ba-850c669b5080@gmail.com> <87lfdctq83.wl-herbert@gojira.at> <f5ba064c-f606-3514-1dba-3735edd9cf8b@gmail.com> <87pn2nu3n8.wl-herbert@gojira.at> <1d6c0954-ca13-b3a0-3e82-c79df594e357@gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, Jan 2, 2021 at 8:43 AM Graham Perrin <grahamperrin@gmail.com> wrote: > On 02/01/2021 08:47, Herbert J. Skuhra wrote: > > >> < > https://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/makeworld.html>; > >> still describes use of `svnlite` (not `git` or `got`) and, I guess, > >> might continue to do so for some time. > >> > >> In this context, is `cd /usr/src` still true? > > If you clone the repository to /usr/src instead of e.g. > > /usr/src/freebsd-current. > > Thanks again. > > I imagine that use cases will _eventually_ include trios of directories, > as siblings, for example: > > /usr/src/doc /usr/src/freebsd-stable > > /usr/src/ports > > True: there's the tradition of /usr/ports > > however with all three things moved, or moving, to Git it seems (to me) > sensible to have the source files for ports at > > /usr/src/ports > > For consistency. A cohesive approach. > There's no change. The current preferred way is to clone into /usr all three repos.... /usr/src /usr/doc /usr/ports One is, of course, free to put things where one wants, but that's no different than with svn. Warner
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CANCZdfr10vYTZUEYzQtooBWuSZwksh%2BS3qBs5fHbiXmp6ed6wg>