Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2007 10:09:48 -0700 From: hal <hl700@cc.usu.edu> To: questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Why is sysinstall considered end-of-life? Message-ID: <49B2C73B-2D53-43BE-AB0A-FD47CAD12B81@cc.usu.edu> In-Reply-To: <AD428222-3E42-4793-9218-796BF72BA670@tca-cable-connector.com> References: <73387c420701071410p710a3436gdecda61d57643950@mail.gmail.com> <17825.31582.782224.263685@jerusalem.litteratus.org> <45A18615.9000900@netscape.net> <004401c733bf$02c47cb0$3c01a8c0@coolf89ea26645> <AD428222-3E42-4793-9218-796BF72BA670@tca-cable-connector.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Jan 9, 2007, at 1:19 AM, David Schulz wrote: > to be honest, i actually like the sys-install program. i did it so > many times, that i just fly trough the sys-install installation in > like a minute to do a plain basic installation. i also like the > fact that i can just use it via ssh from a remote location without > a hassle. Likewise, sysinstall was never that difficult to use and now is nearly automatic. There are some places that could be tuned/cleaned up but nothing to get excited about. hal
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?49B2C73B-2D53-43BE-AB0A-FD47CAD12B81>