Date: Mon, 6 Oct 1997 08:14:27 -0700 (PDT) From: "Rodney W. Grimes" <rgrimes@GndRsh.aac.dev.com> To: rone@bofh.noc.best.net (Ron Echeverri) Cc: stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: CVSUP vs. SNAPS Message-ID: <199710061514.IAA00340@GndRsh.aac.dev.com> In-Reply-To: <199710032209.PAA15020@bofh.noc.best.net> from Ron Echeverri at "Oct 3, 97 03:09:51 pm"
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> Rodney W. Grimes writes:
> > >How about the fact that a 2.2.2 release occured, but somthing built
> > >from the bits on the 2.2.0 branch report via uname that they are
> > >2.2-STABLE. That is going down!
> > No, "2.2" refers to the branch, not to a release. I think we make that
> > pretty clear.
> David, perhaps you should try and figure out just what OS I am running:
> Orbit:root {104}# uname -a
> FreeBSD Orbit.qcsn.com 2.2-STABLE FreeBSD 2.2-STABLE #2: Fri Sep 19 13:56:36 PDT 1997 root@Orbit.aac.dev.com:/usr/src/sys/compile/ORBIT i386
>
> Now you tell me, is that before or after 2.2.2???
>
> If you're running -stable, you're supposed to be tracking -stable. If
> you aren't, it's your own fault.
Ohh... let me see, I sell system for a living, 100's a year, my clients
like them to come preloaded with the latest bits that I have certified
for production use, they install the box and it runs, infact it runs
great for a year or so, then they call me because they want to change
some things, well, I have to figure out what they have before I go
makeing recomendations.
No, noone said just because you LOAD a custom built X.Y-STABLE that
you have to track it.
--
Rod Grimes rgrimes@gndrsh.aac.dev.com
Accurate Automation, Inc. Reliable computers for FreeBSD
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199710061514.IAA00340>
