Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 22 Jul 1995 18:12:56 -0700
From:      "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com>
To:        rkw@dataplex.net (Richard Wackerbarth)
Cc:        freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Support charges ( was Re: SUP target for -STABLE...) 
Message-ID:  <1146.806461976@time.cdrom.com>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sat, 22 Jul 1995 19:11:09 CDT." <v02130500ac3728a4eb9b@[199.183.109.242]> 

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> I would like to suggest that the -STABLE tree be distributed by CTM as well
> as other mechanisms. This mechanism is particularly appropriate when the
> changes are infrequent in nature.

Of course.  I don't see any reason that ANY branch we advertise should
not be made available by both sup and CTM..  It's just a question of
resources, and I expect resources would be made available as real
money started coming in (and it goes without saying that we've now
come to the point where separate machines for mail, sup/CTM, testing
and development would be a real plus).

					Jordan



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1146.806461976>