Date: Sun, 02 Mar 1997 13:36:12 -0800 From: Amancio Hasty <hasty@rah.star-gate.com> To: Charles Henrich <henrich@crh.cl.msu.edu> Cc: jmb@freefall.freebsd.org, ejs@bfd.com, jkh@time.cdrom.com, taob@risc.org, freebsd-chat@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 2.2 Compiler slower than 2.1? (was RSA 56-bit key challenge) Message-ID: <199703022136.NAA06629@rah.star-gate.com> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sun, 02 Mar 1997 16:21:29 EST." <199703022121.QAA10831@crh.cl.msu.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Done!
Now if we can convince bror@sms.fi to overclock his dual pentium and get him
the new client we may be able to beat the dual 400mhz alpha 8)
Also, we are getting awfully close to 400k keys/sec 8)
Cheers,
Amancio
>From The Desk Of Charles Henrich :
> >
> > Cool!
> >
> > I got hold of a 2.1 machine and recompiled the binary
> > this is what I am getting:
> >
> > {hasty} ./client -m
> > rc5-56-client: Performance testing with 1000000 crypts
> > rc5-56-client: Complete in 2.614 seconds. (382627.93 keys/sec)
> > {hasty} ./client -m
> > rc5-56-client: Performance testing with 1000000 crypts
> > rc5-56-client: Complete in 2.566 seconds. (389699.01 keys/sec)
> > {hasty}
> >
> > Now a client compiled on my 3.0 box:
> >
> > {hasty} ./client -m
> > rc5-56-client: Performance testing with 1000000 crypts
> > rc5-56-client: Complete in 4.449 seconds. (224788.41 keys/sec)
>
> You need to now update your stats on vex :) What IS vex anyway? And how did
> it become associated with us FreeBSD folk?
>
> -Crh
>
> Charles Henrich Michigan State University henrich@msu.edu
>
> http://pilot.msu.edu/~henrich
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199703022136.NAA06629>