Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2006 14:58:36 -0500 (EST) From: Daniel Eischen <deischen@freebsd.org> To: Scott Long <scottl@samsco.org> Cc: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org>, Gleb Smirnoff <glebius@freebsd.org>, Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org>, current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: kernel thread as real threads.. Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.43.0601201458110.1773-100000@sea.ntplx.net> In-Reply-To: <43D13F35.1030308@samsco.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, 20 Jan 2006, Scott Long wrote: > Daniel Eischen wrote: > > > On Fri, 20 Jan 2006, Scott Long wrote: > > > >>Does pthreads allow the programmer to name threads in a user and/or > >>kernel visible way? Is this something that is really all that > >>important? > > > > > > Only in a non-portable way. See pthread_set_name_np(3). > > > > Well, for the time being, I can't see why we can't specifically > name kthreads and use the process name for user threads. I think that makes more sense anyway. -- DE
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.GSO.4.43.0601201458110.1773-100000>