Date: Mon, 29 Mar 1999 11:40:42 -0800 (PST) From: Archie Cobbs <archie@whistle.com> To: julian@whistle.com (Julian Elischer) Cc: romanp@wuppy.rcs.ru, current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Status of 'tee' firewall action Message-ID: <199903291940.LAA28510@bubba.whistle.com> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.3.95.990329091217.13619B-100000@current1.whistle.com> from Julian Elischer at "Mar 29, 99 09:14:05 am"
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Julian Elischer writes: > Unfortunatly the 'tee' option is quite a bit more complicated than it > looks.this is because teh normal way that packets get to divert sockets > and the way it'd have to get there from a 'tee' are kinda incompatible. > > It can be done but it's just not quite as straight forward as it first > appears.. > > On Mon, 29 Mar 1999, Roman V. Palagin wrote: > > > > What the status of 'tee' action? Anybody working on it? As a workaround, use "divert" instead of "tee" and immediately write any packet you read, using the same struct sockaddr, back to the socket. -Archie ___________________________________________________________________________ Archie Cobbs * Whistle Communications, Inc. * http://www.whistle.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199903291940.LAA28510>