Date: Thu, 9 May 2013 11:24:53 -0700 From: "Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@hub.org> To: Mark Felder <feld@feld.me> Cc: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Subject: Re: NFS Performance issue against NetApp Message-ID: <030E4A04-D597-49BD-8979-27C3EFB6D276@hub.org> In-Reply-To: <op.wwia5vd034t2sn@tech304.office.supranet.net> References: <834305228.13772274.1367527941142.JavaMail.root@k-state.edu> <75CB6F1E-385D-4E51-876E-7BB8D7140263@hub.org> <20130502221857.GJ32659@physics.umn.edu> <420165EE-BBBF-4E97-B476-58FFE55A52AA@hub.org> <op.wwia5vd034t2sn@tech304.office.supranet.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
FYI =85 I just installed Solaris 11 onto the same hardware and ran the = same test =85 so far, I'm seeing: Linux @ ~30s Solaris @ ~44s OpenBSD @ ~200s FreeBSD @ ~240s I've even tried FreeBSD 8.3 just to see if maybe its as 'newish' issue =85= same as 9.x =85 I could see Linux 'cutting corners', but Oracle/Solaris = too =85 ? On 2013-05-03, at 04:50 , Mark Felder <feld@feld.me> wrote: > On Thu, 02 May 2013 18:43:17 -0500, Marc G. Fournier <scrappy@hub.org> = wrote: >=20 >> Hadn't thought to do so with Linux, but =85 >> Linux =85=85. 20732ms, 20117ms, 20935ms, 20130ms, 20560ms >> FreeBSD .. 28996ms, 24794ms, 24702ms, 23311ms, 24153ms >=20 > Please make sure both platforms are using similar atime settings. I = think most distros use ext4 with diratime by default. I'd just do = noatime on both platforms to be safe. > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-fs@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-fs > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-fs-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?030E4A04-D597-49BD-8979-27C3EFB6D276>