Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2004 12:42:17 +0100 From: "Timur I. Bakeyev" <timur@com.bat.ru> To: "Mike Jakubik" <mike@afirma.ca>, <dwcjr@FreeBSD.org> Cc: ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD Port: samba* Message-ID: <web-156290@mail.bat.ru> In-Reply-To: <20040218141223.67D5B43D2F@mx1.FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, 18 Feb 2004 09:12:18 -0500 "Mike Jakubik" <mike@afirma.ca> wrote: >Hello, > > I am just wondering, but shouldn't samba be moved to >samba-old and >samba-devel to samba? It is my understanding that the >latest stable code is >3.0.2a, and the 2.2 branch is only getting security >updates. Well, 3.0 branch isn't yet 'stable' in the FreeBSD sence, at least. If you take a look on a samba roadmap, they expect stability only in the 3.x series of samba. Samba 3 is still for brave ones or for those who need new features badly :) Cheers, Timur.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?web-156290>