Date: Sat, 11 Oct 2003 00:41:07 +0400 From: Lev Serebryakov <lev@FreeBSD.org> To: Oliver Eikemeier <eikemeier@fillmore-labs.com> Cc: ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re[2]: Ports conflicts: `lib/libiberty.a' Message-ID: <1223794327.20031011004107@serebryakov.spb.ru> In-Reply-To: <3F86B135.5050001@fillmore-labs.com> References: <22159707417.20031010130423@serebryakov.spb.ru> <3F868513.4030607@gmx.net> <179171965963.20031010162842@serebryakov.spb.ru> <3F86B135.5050001@fillmore-labs.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hello, Oliver!
Friday, October 10, 2003, 5:16:37 PM, you wrote:
>> It is STATIC library! It could not be used by ALREADY compiled &
>> installed ports! And ALL these ports compile this library by
>> itself and use OWN version on build stage, and DON'T use installed
>> library!
OE> Then perhaps it shouldn't be installed anyway?
I think so. But authors of binutils/gcc have other opinion (they are
GNU people and like to push their COPYING, libibery, etc. in each
hole).
>> And, If I write CONFLICTS=, based on `lib/libiberty.a', IT WILL BE
>> IMPOSIIBLE to install cross-binutils & cross-gcc EVENT for one platform
>> together! It is very strange situation, IMHO.
OE> If you don't care, you could install them with DISABLE_CONFLICTS=yes.
I think, it is invalid situation. Because DISABLE_CONFLICTS=yes
could afraid some users and here is no conflicts, really, but
overwriting of unused files.
Lev Serebryakov
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1223794327.20031011004107>