Date: Wed, 24 Jul 2002 17:05:06 -0400 From: "Dave [Hawk-Systems]" <dave@hawk-systems.com> To: "Aaron Weiker" <aaron@weiker.org>, <freebsd-isp@freebsd.org> Cc: <clint@kconline.com> Subject: RE: Re: Livingston Radius Message-ID: <DBEIKNMKGOBGNDHAAKGNAEIIAHAB.dave@hawk-systems.com> In-Reply-To: <d774951c556b4a789e501384a61162c6.aaron@weiker.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>> Personally I'd go with another radius server if you can as (for a start) >> I believe Livingston radius isn't being maintained, and it's not very >> expandable or modular compared to some other ones around nowadays. >> (I know this from experience I had when I had to add features to the >> code for a past employer, it wasn't fun :) > >I'm using freeradius which seems to be one of the more flexible that >I've seen. I believe it to be better than some of the ones that cost >thousands of dollars. But this is my opionon. XTradius in the ports is nice if you are a heavy perl/shell scripter... option to pump all authentication our to external scripts which open the door for database auth, and other customization without having to deal with restrictions of the radius server. For our use anyway works great (isp with virtual resellers and heavy Cisco AVPair returns to the NAS). Cheers, Dave To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?DBEIKNMKGOBGNDHAAKGNAEIIAHAB.dave>