Date: Tue, 4 Jun 2002 17:30:44 -0400 (EDT) From: Garrett Wollman <wollman@lcs.mit.edu> To: brian@Awfulhak.org Cc: arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Avoiding unnecessary breakage (was Re: Removing wait union) Message-ID: <200206042130.g54LUijN025978@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu> In-Reply-To: <20020604222022.6f935871.brian@Awfulhak.org> References: <200206041752.NAA08182@rodney.cnchost.com> <p05111724b922b2b4d44b@[128.113.24.47]>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 In article <20020604222022.6f935871.brian@Awfulhak.org> you write: >Many software vendors would say that a published interface can only be >removed after two major releases of the software. By that measure, `union wait' has been deprecated to the extent of not being documented for almost ten years. 4.4-Lite only documented the Standard interface. - -GAWollman -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQE8/TGCI+eG6b7tlG4RAqxTAKCpGda3MrJR6m8VATZ+oUAgprKH6wCdELMC iX0jPsvMP3DFrG55eijw3tg= =si16 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200206042130.g54LUijN025978>