Date: Wed, 24 May 2006 15:21:59 +0300 From: Andriy Gapon <avg@icyb.net.ua> To: "[LoN]Kamikaze" <LoN_Kamikaze@gmx.de> Cc: freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 5.4=>6.1 regression: nforce2 vs. APIC [+fix] Message-ID: <44744FE7.1070301@icyb.net.ua> In-Reply-To: <446DE5B3.1040101@icyb.net.ua> References: <446DD5EB.6030300@icyb.net.ua> <446DDC3E.1080102@gmx.de> <446DE5B3.1040101@icyb.net.ua>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
on 19/05/2006 18:35 Andriy Gapon said the following: > on 19/05/2006 17:54 [LoN]Kamikaze said the following: >> Andriy Gapon wrote: >>> [Disclaimer, just in case: I do mean APIC, not ACPI] >>> >>> >>> Based on that info and the linux patch in that thread I came up with the >>> following PCI fixup. Now I am running 6.1 with both APIC and "C1 >>> disconnect" enabled for 2 days without any problems. >>> >> Did you file a PR with your fix? > > Not yet. I wanted to receive some feedback and test results first (and > kinda hoped that this will get included without a PR). > I've created a PR: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=97785 Thanks again to John Baldwin for his very much improved version of the patch. -- Andriy Gapon
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?44744FE7.1070301>