Date: Thu, 19 Nov 1998 16:13:50 -0800 (PST) From: Tom Bartol <bartol@salk.edu> To: John Polstra <jdp@polstra.com> Cc: current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Problem with amd (was: NFS problems in -current) Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.96.981119160014.368C-100000@eccles.salk.edu> In-Reply-To: <199811192221.OAA09145@vashon.polstra.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Thanks for the info. I'll try it out tomorrow. If I want NFSv3 with UDP I suppose I would say: proto=udp,vers=3 correct? BTW, I can't find these options documented in amd(8) amd.conf(5) or mount_nfs(8). Any place else I should be looking? Tom On Thu, 19 Nov 1998, John Polstra wrote: > In article <Pine.BSF.3.96.981118162323.363A-100000@eccles.salk.edu>, > Tom Bartol <bartol@salk.edu> wrote: > > > > O.K. Here's another big clue. I had been mounting using amd. If I mount > > without amd then all is well and performance is much better also. I now > > get ~9MBps instead of ~4MBps over a 100BT segment. > > Aha! The new amd uses different options to select the protocol for > NFS. I bet you still have an old amd.map file. For the new amd, > the desired options are "proto=udp,vers=2". > > John > -- > John Polstra jdp@polstra.com > John D. Polstra & Co., Inc. Seattle, Washington USA > "Nobody ever went broke underestimating the taste of the American public." > -- H. L. Mencken > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.3.96.981119160014.368C-100000>