Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2003 07:45:30 -0700 From: Michael Sierchio <kudzu@tenebras.com> To: David Schultz <das@FreeBSD.ORG> Cc: security@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Removable media security in FreeBSD Message-ID: <3EE5EF0A.7060703@tenebras.com> In-Reply-To: <20030610103830.GC14407@HAL9000.homeunix.com> References: <20030608080429.GA234@hhos.serious.ld> <Pine.NEB.3.96L.1030608115332.67632D-100000@fledge.watson.org> <20030610103830.GC14407@HAL9000.homeunix.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
David Schultz wrote:
> FAT is somewhat less robust than UFS. ...
That is possibly the most subtle funny thing I have read
all day. "An orange crate is somewhat less robust than
a Humvee" is how I read that.
--
"Well," Brahma said, "even after ten thousand explanations, a fool is no
wiser, but an intelligent man requires only two thousand five hundred."
- The Mahabharata
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3EE5EF0A.7060703>