Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2004 16:27:55 -0800 From: Chris Pressey <cpressey@catseye.mine.nu> To: Paul Seniura <pdseniura@techie.com> Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: I believe lang/icc* are not open-source nor 'free', right? Message-ID: <20040318162755.52513b6c.cpressey@catseye.mine.nu> In-Reply-To: <20040318213442.D38635C35@techpc04.okladot.state.ok.us> References: <200403122136.i2CLaCm9096276@repoman.freebsd.org> <20040318213442.D38635C35@techpc04.okladot.state.ok.us>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, 18 Mar 2004 15:34:42 -0600 (CST) "Paul Seniura" <pdseniura@techie.com> wrote: > I don't want to discuss Intel compilers on AMD or whatever > else the issues are in the previous threads. > > I am posting this on the -ports forum because I am asking > about lang/icc* strictly as ports and how I will use them > as ports. > [...] > If, for example, in the future any part of the CD ISOs are > built by 'icc', then I/we are forbidden to use them. OK... so don't use the icc port to do that... ? > I will therefore absolutely oppose any such changes in > FreeBSD itself, in its default build configurations, in > its (binary or 'ready-to-run') distribution, and so on. > > Keep FreeBSD 'free' AND open-source. > > All of it. FreeBSD != ports/packages. That's what "3rd-party" means. -Chris
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040318162755.52513b6c.cpressey>