Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 15:26:29 -0500 From: Garance A Drosihn <drosih@rpi.edu> To: Christoph Mallon <christoph.mallon@gmx.de> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Alternatives to gcc (was Re: gcc 4.3: when will it becomestandard compiler?) Message-ID: <p06240800c5a7c06bb469@[128.113.24.47]> In-Reply-To: <49816854.9060909@gmx.de> References: <20090128155340.GA75143@lpthe.jussieu.fr> <7508A5B5-C6D2-498A-AEA1-D84E85F1D743@mac.com> <200901291243.00378.doconnor@gsoft.com.au> <49811242.7030106@delphij.net> <498116AB.2060105@gmail.com> <49816854.9060909@gmx.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
At 9:27 AM +0100 1/29/09, Christoph Mallon wrote: >Eitan Adler schrieb: >>To quote from the FAQ: >>Who does this change affect? >> Nobody who is currently using GCC should be affected by this change. > >Let me repeat that: >"Nobody who is currently using GCC *should* be affected by this change." > >Emphasize mine. There have been a couple of different issues brought up in this thread, and I've lost track of which one we're on. But one of the issues is the use of LLVM+gcc, and my guess is that the above statement would not apply to that. That is just my guess, of course. -- Garance Alistair Drosehn = gad@gilead.netel.rpi.edu Senior Systems Programmer or gad@freebsd.org Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute or drosih@rpi.edu
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?p06240800c5a7c06bb469>