Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2001 09:51:01 -0600 From: "Jacques A. Vidrine" <n@nectar.com> To: Daniel Eischen <eischen@vigrid.com> Cc: "Brian F. Feldman" <green@FreeBSD.org>, Warner Losh <imp@harmony.village.org>, arch@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Request For Review: libc/libc_r changes to allow -lc_r Message-ID: <20010122095101.H93103@hamlet.nectar.com> In-Reply-To: <Pine.SUN.3.91.1010121175030.24988A-100000@pcnet1.pcnet.com>; from eischen@vigrid.com on Sun, Jan 21, 2001 at 05:54:48PM -0500 References: <200101212240.f0LMeSc20272@green.dyndns.org> <Pine.SUN.3.91.1010121175030.24988A-100000@pcnet1.pcnet.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, Jan 21, 2001 at 05:54:48PM -0500, Daniel Eischen wrote: > Remember that this is already possible. Our current syscalls are > _foo with foo being a weak definition to _foo. We currently use > foo all over libc and noone seems to object until now. I've objected, but I was not willing to address the issue without code. I still don't have code, but since you do, I thought I'd add my 2 cents :-) Besides, _foo is not really `all over libc' -- just a few calls here and there. Hiding everything needing to be hidden would cause a lot more _foo, _bar, _baz, to the point of being annoying (IMHO). Cheers, -- Jacques Vidrine / n@nectar.com / jvidrine@verio.net / nectar@FreeBSD.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010122095101.H93103>