Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 11 Feb 2021 02:51:11 +0000
From:      bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org
To:        fs@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   [Bug 253424] fusefs: statfs doesn't set f_iosize ("optimal transfer block size")
Message-ID:  <bug-253424-3630-ui19u0otDQ@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-253424-3630@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>

index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=253424

--- Comment #3 from Alan Somers <asomers@FreeBSD.org> ---
(In reply to John Millikin from comment #2)
Oh, I thought you were talking about something that wraps statvfs.  I wouldn't
call statvfs a wrapper; it's the standardized interface for getting information
about a file system.  statfs is the older, but non-portable version.  And the
reason that statvfs uses pathconf is because when it was written (2002) statfs
didn't have an f_namemax field.  f_namemax was only added in 2003 when
statfs(2) was updated for 64-bit block counts.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

home | help

Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-253424-3630-ui19u0otDQ>