Date: Thu, 5 Dec 2024 10:30:56 -0500 From: Ed Maste <emaste@freebsd.org> To: Justin Hibbits <jhibbits@freebsd.org> Cc: John Baldwin <jhb@freebsd.org>, src-committers@freebsd.org, dev-commits-src-all@freebsd.org, dev-commits-src-main@freebsd.org Subject: Re: git: f6efccaa35fe - main - IfAPI: Remove temporary inclusion of if_private.h Message-ID: <CAPyFy2BpjLT5=DipwD67T55J2hBkWnzDK8H-oVWWkQ2zkuBeqQ@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20241204174959.34814f55@ralga.knownspace> References: <202411131929.4ADJTcCe033652@gitrepo.freebsd.org> <343e4be1-6f01-4080-981c-32bf309bacb2@FreeBSD.org> <20241204174959.34814f55@ralga.knownspace>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> I requested an exp-run last year for this very change > (https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=272030), and gave a heads-up > to all the maintainers last July (2023). Some of those ports found > in the exp-run have since been fixed, though as you pointed out above, > not all. PRs have been filed for most of them. We need man pages for the IfAPI routines that maintainers (and/or upstreams) for these ports can use in the process of migrating to IfAPI. IMO removing the if_private.h backwards-compatibility include was premature.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAPyFy2BpjLT5=DipwD67T55J2hBkWnzDK8H-oVWWkQ2zkuBeqQ>