Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2006 10:30:39 -0800 (PST) From: John Nielsen <john@jnielsen.net> To: FreeBSD-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org Cc: John Nielsen <john@jnielsen.net> Subject: bin/105823: Misleading error message from e.g. "df -l -t ufs" Message-ID: <200611211830.kALIUdeh022982@ns1.jnielsen.net> Resent-Message-ID: <200611241600.kAOG0V92067212@freefall.freebsd.org>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>Number: 105823 >Category: bin >Synopsis: Misleading error message from e.g. "df -l -t ufs" >Confidential: no >Severity: non-critical >Priority: low >Responsible: freebsd-bugs >State: open >Quarter: >Keywords: >Date-Required: >Class: sw-bug >Submitter-Id: current-users >Arrival-Date: Fri Nov 24 16:00:30 GMT 2006 >Closed-Date: >Last-Modified: >Originator: John Nielsen >Release: FreeBSD 4.9-RELEASE-p13-jc2 i386 >Organization: >Environment: System: FreeBSD ns1.jnielsen.net 4.9-RELEASE-p13-jc2 FreeBSD 4.9-RELEASE-p13-jc2 #9: Tue Jun 7 00:30:36 PDT 2005 user@jail16.johncompanies.com:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/jail16 i386 Also happens on 6.2-STABLE. >Description: "df -t ufs -l" gives an informative error message; namely that -l and -t are mutually exclusive. However, "df -l -t ufs" produces "only one -t option may be specified", when in fact the error should be the same as in the first case. >How-To-Repeat: df -l -t ufs df -t ufs -l >Fix: >Release-Note: >Audit-Trail: >Unformatted:
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200611211830.kALIUdeh022982>