Date: Tue, 22 Dec 2009 20:02:44 +0100 From: Roman Divacky <rdivacky@FreeBSD.org> To: Erik Cederstrand <erik@cederstrand.dk> Cc: src-committers@FreeBSD.org, jhb@FreeBSD.org, svn-src-all@FreeBSD.org, marius@alchemy.franken.de, svn-src-head@FreeBSD.org, "M. Warner Losh" <imp@bsdimp.com> Subject: Re: svn commit: r200797 - head/lib/libc/stdtime Message-ID: <20091222190244.GA56837@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <A538C406-7480-4EB4-8839-2AA0277858C5@cederstrand.dk> References: <200912211943.nBLJhNUU038425@svn.freebsd.org> <200912211459.21766.jhb@freebsd.org> <20091221220004.GA42400@alchemy.franken.de> <20091221.211648.632868945383134253.imp@bsdimp.com> <20091222141810.GA17221@freebsd.org> <A538C406-7480-4EB4-8839-2AA0277858C5@cederstrand.dk>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
On Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 04:49:48PM +0100, Erik Cederstrand wrote: > Den 22/12/2009 kl. 15.18 skrev Roman Divacky: > > > well... llvm provides its own assembler so if the need for newer binutils > > comes from need of newer as I believe llvm can help here. or is the linker > > the problem? > > It does? I was under the impression that this was still very much a WIP (http://llvm.org/releases/2.6/docs/ReleaseNotes.html#mc) and that LLVM still uses the system assembler and linker. yes, it's a WIP. what I meant was that there's not so much pressure to import newer "as" as we might be getting that from llvm anyway in the time frame...home | help
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20091222190244.GA56837>