Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2024 19:48:40 GMT From: Kyle Evans <kevans@FreeBSD.org> To: src-committers@FreeBSD.org, dev-commits-src-all@FreeBSD.org, dev-commits-src-main@FreeBSD.org Subject: git: 5738d741fb79 - main - kern: tty: fix recanonicalization Message-ID: <202401241948.40OJmeWQ007131@gitrepo.freebsd.org>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
The branch main has been updated by kevans: URL: https://cgit.FreeBSD.org/src/commit/?id=5738d741fb796c1f0a6b5c2157af7de58104ac97 commit 5738d741fb796c1f0a6b5c2157af7de58104ac97 Author: Kyle Evans <kevans@FreeBSD.org> AuthorDate: 2024-01-24 19:36:26 +0000 Commit: Kyle Evans <kevans@FreeBSD.org> CommitDate: 2024-01-24 19:48:31 +0000 kern: tty: fix recanonicalization `ti->ti_begin` is actually the offset within the first block that is unread, so we must use that for our lower bound. Moving to the previous block has to be done at the end of the loop in order to correctly handle the case of ti_begin == TTYINQ_DATASIZE. At that point, lastblock is still the last one with data written and the next write into the queue would advance lastblock. If we move to the previous block at the beginning, then we're essentially off by one block for the entire scan and run the risk of running off the end of the block queue. The ti_begin == 0 case is still handled correctly, as we skip the loop entirely and the linestart gets recorded as the first byte available for writing. The bit after the loop about moving to the next block is also still correct, even with both previous fixes in mind: we skipped moving to the previous block if we hit ti_begin, and `off + 1` would in-fact be a member of the next block from where we're reading if it falls on a block boundary. Reported by: dim Fixes: 522083ffbd1ab ("kern: tty: recanonicalize the buffer on [...]") --- sys/kern/tty_inq.c | 22 +++++++++++----------- 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-) diff --git a/sys/kern/tty_inq.c b/sys/kern/tty_inq.c index 533fdfd30ce9..589d958e59fa 100644 --- a/sys/kern/tty_inq.c +++ b/sys/kern/tty_inq.c @@ -371,12 +371,9 @@ ttyinq_canonicalize_break(struct ttyinq *ti, const char *breakc) /* Start just past the end... */ off = ti->ti_end; - canon = 0; - - while (off > 0) { - if ((off % TTYINQ_DATASIZE) == 0) - tib = tib->tib_prev; + canon = ti->ti_begin; + while (off > ti->ti_begin) { off--; boff = off % TTYINQ_DATASIZE; @@ -384,20 +381,23 @@ ttyinq_canonicalize_break(struct ttyinq *ti, const char *breakc) canon = off + 1; break; } + + if (off != ti->ti_begin && boff == 0) + tib = tib->tib_prev; } - MPASS(canon > 0 || off == 0); + MPASS(canon > ti->ti_begin || off == ti->ti_begin); /* - * We should only be able to hit bcanon == 0 if we walked everything we - * have and didn't find any of the break characters, so if bcanon == 0 - * then tib is already the correct block and we should avoid touching - * it. + * We should only be able to hit canon == ti_begin if we walked + * everything we have and didn't find any of the break characters, so + * if canon == ti_begin then tib is already the correct block and we + * should avoid touching it. * * For all other scenarios, if canon lies on a block boundary then tib * has already advanced to the previous block. */ - if (canon != 0 && (canon % TTYINQ_DATASIZE) == 0) + if (canon != ti->ti_begin && (canon % TTYINQ_DATASIZE) == 0) tib = tib->tib_next; ti->ti_linestart = ti->ti_reprint = canon; ti->ti_startblock = ti->ti_reprintblock = tib;
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?202401241948.40OJmeWQ007131>