Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2007 02:31:06 -0800 From: Doug Barton <dougb@FreeBSD.org> To: Tuomo Valkonen <tuomov@iki.fi> Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Ion3 removal (Re: Ion3 license violation) Message-ID: <476109EA.3040807@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <slrnfm1oed.mqu.tuomov@jolt.modeemi.cs.tut.fi> References: <20071212213200.D576216A469@hub.freebsd.org> <200712121701.57460.mi%2Bmill@aldan.algebra.com> <200712130002.09967.danny@ricin.com> <slrnfm1oed.mqu.tuomov@jolt.modeemi.cs.tut.fi>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
Tuomo Valkonen wrote:
> On 2007-12-12, Danny Pansters <danny@ricin.com> wrote:
>> The guy was never trying to find any compromise.
>
> What compromise can be had, when the distros never try to be
> constructive?
Given that as your perspective (which you are of course entitled to),
and given that we've already removed the software from our ports tree,
I think it's probably reasonable at this point to let this thread die.
Doug
--
This .signature sanitized for your protection
home |
help
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?476109EA.3040807>