Date: Thu, 19 Nov 1998 16:33:24 -0800 (PST) From: Tom Bartol <bartol@salk.edu> To: John Polstra <jdp@polstra.com> Cc: current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Problem with amd (was: NFS problems in -current) Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.96.981119162153.368D-100000@eccles.salk.edu> In-Reply-To: <XFMail.981119161749.jdp@polstra.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, 19 Nov 1998, John Polstra wrote: > On 20-Nov-98 Tom Bartol wrote: > > > > Thanks for the info. I'll try it out tomorrow. If I want NFSv3 with UDP > > I suppose I would say: > > > > proto=udp,vers=3 > > > > correct? > > Correct. I had problems using NFSv3 the last time I tried it, but > that was several months ago. Maybe it's better now. > I'm using NFSv3 right now (without amd) and it's been excellent -- ~9MBps for file writes over 100BT, half duplex at the moment to our Auspex file server. We're waiting on a patch from Auspex to allow us to go full duplex. I've tried full duplex between FreeBSD machines with NFSv3 and I get ~11MBps file writes!! Which is basically full wire speed. I LOVE FreeBSD! > > BTW, I can't find these options documented in amd(8) amd.conf(5) or > > mount_nfs(8). Any place else I should be looking? > > Not that I know of. The documentation is pretty broken. I had a > very hard time even finding the right options in the sources. > > John > --- Perhaps I can find some time to at least help with the documentation, instead of always complaining about this thing or that. I'll look at the amd source and texinfo in /usr/src/contrib/amd and see what I can do... Thanks again for your help, Tom To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.3.96.981119162153.368D-100000>