Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2014 12:49:09 +0000 From: Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@FreeBSD.org> To: Baptiste Daroussin <bapt@FreeBSD.org> Cc: Mathieu Arnold <mat@freebsd.org>, svn-ports-head@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, Eitan Adler <eadler@freebsd.org>, ports-committers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r358722 - head/Mk Message-ID: <20140623124909.GB18367@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <20140623124533.GP23976@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> References: <201406211708.s5LH8ZvE087036@svn.freebsd.org> <CAF6rxgkeu0BG5pzN1rJ=u=5VnNgmVuN2PWbay13RY7qMt7JCmA@mail.gmail.com> <20140623124533.GP23976@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 02:45:33PM +0200, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > On Sat, Jun 21, 2014 at 10:17:19AM -0700, Eitan Adler wrote: > > IMHO this is silly. The risk of changing description text is almost > > zero. Sweeping changes should be reviewed, but I don't think gating > > the review on a member of portmgr is useful. > > > Given what happened recently on those yes portmgr needs to review those > sweep I don't see why those won't be caught via normal peer reviews. There is always someone's watching those svn diffs. ./danfe
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20140623124909.GB18367>