Date: Sun, 30 Aug 1998 11:53:12 -0700 From: Studded <Studded@dal.net> To: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com> Cc: committers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: make.conf Message-ID: <35E99F98.412A0513@dal.net> References: <1018.904492666@time.cdrom.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Jordan K. Hubbard wrote: I like this idea, *if* the file is split, however creating 3 new files in 3 new locations all with the same name seems like unnecessary confusication to me. How about src.conf.mk, ports.conf.mk and sys.conf.mk? Doug > If /etc/make.conf is split at all then it should be split into: > > /usr/src/conf.mk - configuration frobs exclusively for /usr/src > > /usr/ports/conf.mk - configuration frobs exclusively for /usr/ports. > > /usr/share/mk/conf.mk - stuff truly global to any invocation of Bmake > e.g. variables you want both src and ports > (and so on) to get as a base set before > potentially laying their own on top.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?35E99F98.412A0513>