Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 22 Dec 2014 10:25:16 -0800
From:      Rui Paulo <rpaulo@me.com>
To:        Scott Ellis <scott@jumpnowtek.com>
Cc:        freebsd-arm@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: PANDABOARD default scheduler
Message-ID:  <EB4D9097-463E-453A-8BAE-E4AF84E812A8@me.com>
In-Reply-To: <1419260211677-5975286.post@n5.nabble.com>
References:  <1419260211677-5975286.post@n5.nabble.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Dec 22, 2014, at 06:56, Scott Ellis <scott@jumpnowtek.com> wrote:
>=20
> Why does the PANDABOARD kernel config default to SCHED_4BSD instead
> of SCHED_ULE? It's a dual-core board.=20
>=20
> Just curious.

I don't think there's any good reason.  PANDABOARD started out as a =
uniprocessor configuration and we probably forgot to test ULE once we =
implemented SMP.

--
Rui Paulo






Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?EB4D9097-463E-453A-8BAE-E4AF84E812A8>