Date: Sat, 20 Apr 2002 14:51:39 -0700 From: "Crist J. Clark" <cjc@FreeBSD.ORG> To: Lyndon Nerenberg <lyndon@orthanc.ab.ca> Cc: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Adding a 'bpf' group for /dev/bpf* Message-ID: <20020420145139.D76898@blossom.cjclark.org> In-Reply-To: <200204202139.g3KLdEJ80591@orthanc.ab.ca>; from lyndon@orthanc.ab.ca on Sat, Apr 20, 2002 at 03:39:14PM -0600 References: <200204202139.g3KLdEJ80591@orthanc.ab.ca>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
On Sat, Apr 20, 2002 at 03:39:14PM -0600, Lyndon Nerenberg wrote:
> For the benefit of packet sniffers and other things that only want
> read-only access to /dev/bpf*, what do people think of adding a 'bpf'
> group for those programs? This allows bpf devices to be read by
> programs running with an effective gid of 'bpf' instead of the current
> requirement for an effective user of root. I've been running this way
> on many of our servers for several months now, and things like snort,
> tcpdump, etc., are quite happy with it (under stable).
I do this a lot too on systems where it makes sense. But I'm not sure
I understand what you are asking to be done. Is it asking too much of
an administrator to do,
# echo 'sniff:*:80:<list of users>' >> /etc/group
# chown root:sniff /dev/bpf*
# chmod 640 /dev/bpf*
To do the appropriate customizations?
--
Crist J. Clark | cjclark@alum.mit.edu
| cjclark@jhu.edu
http://people.freebsd.org/~cjc/ | cjc@freebsd.org
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
help
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020420145139.D76898>