Date: Sat, 27 Jan 2001 12:48:36 -0800 (PST) From: Matthew Jacob <mjacob@feral.com> To: Jason Evans <jasone@canonware.com> Cc: Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@ofug.org>, freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: XXX driver didn't initialize queue mtx Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0101271246240.13274-100000@zeppo.feral.com> In-Reply-To: <20010127124149.O87569@canonware.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Shouldn't ether_ifattach initialize the mutex? Or do expect all drivers to initialize these prior to calling ether_ifattach? Look- I just want to know what the people who put the check in *want*..... > On Sat, Jan 27, 2001 at 12:36:41PM -0800, Matthew Jacob wrote: > > > > Oh, I suppose, I did find that... well, mainly I wanted the person who made > > the change to actually broadcast to NIC maintainers what the expectations > > were... > > The code that prints these warnings out has existed for a while. However, > whoever added it made a bad assumption about the internals of the mutex > implementation, so the code never got executed. I "fixed" it last week, so > the warnings get printed now. > > Jason > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.LNX.4.21.0101271246240.13274-100000>