Date: Mon, 28 May 2018 21:04:39 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: python@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 226634] devel/py-setuptools: pkg-static: py27-setuptools-38.5.2 conflicts with py36-setuptools-38.5.2 (installs files into the same place). Problematic file: /usr/local/bin/easy_install Message-ID: <bug-226634-21822-Vf4qEpTRib@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-226634-21822@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-226634-21822@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D226634 --- Comment #7 from Serge <skh1002@hotmail.com> --- First of all, a clarification. It is py36-setuptools that is incompatible w= ith py27-setuptools, not py36-setuptools_scm. My problem is that I cannot have= =20 py36-setuptools + py27-setuptools at the same time. Now, you may be right that changing DEFAULT_VERSIONS is not supported, but = in this particular case, samba47 explicitly depends on py27 flavour of py-setuptools. Just to double-check, I rebuilt it with DEFAULT_VERSIONS+=3D python=3D3.6, but it did not change anything. Therefore, regardless of support, there is a dilemma: if I set DEFAULT_VERSIONS+=3D python=3D2.7, I am unable to build py-iocage, because = it explicitly depends on py36; and if I set it to 3.6, samba47 will still pull= in py27-setuptools because it explicitly depends on 2.7. If I had something depending on py36-setuptools before, I would not have been able to build samba47.=20 So, one way or another this still comes to py27-setuptools being apparently incompatible with py36-setuptools. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-226634-21822-Vf4qEpTRib>