Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2000 20:31:11 -0700 (MST) From: "Chad R. Larson" <chad@DCFinc.com> To: beng@lcs.mit.edu (Benjamin Greenwald) Cc: ohartman@ipamzlx.physik.uni-mainz.de, freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Whats is this? FBSD 4.1 isn't stable! Message-ID: <200009210331.UAA03982@freeway.dcfinc.com> In-Reply-To: <20000920185458.B29063@lcs.mit.edu> from Benjamin Greenwald at "Sep 20, 0 06:54:58 pm"
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
As I recall, Benjamin Greenwald wrote: > Generally, the system gets more robust the more releases there are > down a particular branch. That is one of the reasons some people > continue to use FreeBSD-3.x ... they don't yet trust -Stable. Or, in my case, 2.2.8-STABLE, which is rock solid for what I do. Bitrot in the ports collection is my only grief, since the ports collection doesn't make an effort to support the 2.x tree. If I needed SMP, or some other VM magic, I might change my mind. But... -crl -- Chad R. Larson (CRL15) 602-953-1392 Brother, can you paradigm? chad@dcfinc.com chad@larsons.org larson1@home.net DCF, Inc. - 14623 North 49th Place, Scottsdale, Arizona 85254-2207 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200009210331.UAA03982>