Date: Thu, 05 Sep 2002 00:35:37 +0100 From: Ian Dowse <iedowse@maths.tcd.ie> To: Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au> Cc: Daniel Rock <D.Rock@t-online.de>, current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: fsck cannot find superblock Message-ID: <200209050035.aa83853@salmon.maths.tcd.ie> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Thu, 05 Sep 2002 06:24:49 %2B1000." <20020905053617.Q2728-100000@gamplex.bde.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <20020905053617.Q2728-100000@gamplex.bde.org>, Bruce Evans writes: >> * drop support for 4K block sizes completely, but this breaks >> backwards compatibility > >I use patches like the following for the sanity checks: I think there may be other problems that are triggered by using <8k blocks on -current too. Last time I tried 4k blocks (pre-UFS2), the snapshot code would cause a panic when trying to allocate a single 4k block to fit the 8k superblock (the machine then got stuck in a reboot-fsck-panic cycle until interrupted and manually fsck'd). Ian To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi? <200209050035.aa83853>