Date: Sun, 06 Apr 2003 21:16:55 +0200 From: des@ofug.org (Dag-Erling =?iso-8859-1?q?Sm=F8rgrav?=) To: "Poul-Henning Kamp" <phk@phk.freebsd.dk> Cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: weird fxp / timecounter interaction in top-of-tree Message-ID: <xzpsmsvl9lk.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no> In-Reply-To: <28859.1049655248@critter.freebsd.dk> ("Poul-Henning Kamp"'s message of "Sun, 06 Apr 2003 20:54:08 %2B0200") References: <28859.1049655248@critter.freebsd.dk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
"Poul-Henning Kamp" <phk@phk.freebsd.dk> writes: > Defining "best" is at best hard, so I have resorted to the simple > technique we use now: Don't call tc_init on a timecounter unless > you want to use it. Huh? I added a Debugger() call to tc_init(), and can assure you that it gets called for every timecounter in the system (in my case i8254, PIIX, TSC and ACPI, not necessarily in that order). DES --=20 Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav - des@ofug.org
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?xzpsmsvl9lk.fsf>