Date: Sun, 20 May 2007 09:09:24 -0400 From: Alexander Kabaev <kabaev@gmail.com> To: Alexander Leidinger <Alexander@Leidinger.net> Cc: Ed Schouten <ed@fxq.nl>, Ariff Abdullah <ariff@FreeBSD.org>, current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [Regression] snd_emu10k1 doesn't work after GCC 4.2 upgrade Message-ID: <20070520090924.65e379e7@kan.dnsalias.net> In-Reply-To: <20070520104026.73a3a742@deskjail> References: <20070518192007.6e6a91e1@kan.dnsalias.net> <20070519182811.GW23313@hoeg.nl> <20070520155736.59f36b67.ariff@FreeBSD.org> <20070520104026.73a3a742@deskjail>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
[-- Attachment #1 --] On Sun, 20 May 2007 10:40:26 +0200 Alexander Leidinger <Alexander@Leidinger.net> wrote: > > Wild guess: maybe it uses the same kind of casts as we see with the > openssl problem. See the HEADS-UP from kan@. No way. His card is misbehaving, not crashing his kernel. -- Alexander Kabaev [-- Attachment #2 --] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFGUEiEQ6z1jMm+XZYRAqljAJ9Lky55vySRlkX7px+so3Yz7j78mQCg6iLc /Z7K0m0TiyAXYCrEP4LO5JM= =HwlN -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----home | help
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20070520090924.65e379e7>