Date: Fri, 18 Oct 2024 15:37:30 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 282001] Inappropriate "BOOT LOADER IS TOO OLD" / missing initialization of bootprog_rev in lutils.c Message-ID: <bug-282001-227-2gEfaaTt8x@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-282001-227@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-282001-227@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D282001 Mark Johnston <markj@FreeBSD.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|In Progress |Closed --- Comment #11 from Mark Johnston <markj@FreeBSD.org> --- With 13.5 coming soon, I'm ok with simply closing this. > so it seems like this is "jumping the line" in a big way I don't really agree - we (secteam) release ENs for issues which generate a= lot of bug reports, or if a bug is particularly severe somehow. It's mostly contingent on someone filling out the EN template and submitting it to sect= eam. We rarely reject ENs unless they truly seem trivial or the associated patc= h is too risky. In this case, there are some technical reasons for not releasing an EN, but= if not for that, based on past experience I think we would go ahead with it. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-282001-227-2gEfaaTt8x>