Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2007 14:41:43 +0200 From: Ivan Voras <ivoras@freebsd.org> To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: suggest renaming and extending the -CURRENT and -STABLE lines Message-ID: <fel5lg$dbe$1@sea.gmane.org> In-Reply-To: <fel4qo$2rnp$3@nermal.rz1.convenimus.net> References: <feilee$2m3t$3@nermal.rz1.convenimus.net> <86przndoe8.fsf@ds4.des.no> <feir48$ah4$1@sea.gmane.org> <20071010231643.GF58929@over-yonder.net> <fejovs$lj8$1@sea.gmane.org> <fel4qo$2rnp$3@nermal.rz1.convenimus.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Christian Baer wrote: > On Thu, 11 Oct 2007 01:58:51 +0200 Ivan Voras wrote: > >> Unfortunately (for this developer-centric practice), the trend in large >> and/or important production environments is - as seen in Linux (and >> Solaris) - to severely limit major OS upgrades. > > I don't really see what's so unfortunate about that. Most admins > (including myself) go by the rule "If it ain't broken, don't fix it!" You misunderstood, I agree with the practice :) It's "unfortunate" for developers :)
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?fel5lg$dbe$1>