Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 23 Dec 2010 12:41:26 -0600
From:      Jeremy Messenger <mezz.freebsd@gmail.com>
To:        Doug Barton <dougb@freebsd.org>
Cc:        cvs-ports@freebsd.org, cvs-all@freebsd.org, ports-committers@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: cvs commit: ports/security/dirmngr Makefile ports/security/gnupg Makefile ports/security/gpa Makefile ports/security/gpgme Makefile ports/security/libassuan Makefile distinfo pkg-descr ports/security/opensc Makefile
Message-ID:  <AANLkTik7O8aB-4ehj21NsSc0w6TAjm%2BLP4a5LOkEOqoY@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <201012221916.oBMJGCMY069579@repoman.freebsd.org>
References:  <201012221916.oBMJGCMY069579@repoman.freebsd.org>

index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail

On Wed, Dec 22, 2010 at 1:16 PM, Doug Barton <dougb@freebsd.org> wrote:
> dougb       2010-12-22 19:16:12 UTC
>
>  FreeBSD ports repository
>
>  Modified files:
>    security/dirmngr     Makefile
>    security/gnupg       Makefile
>    security/gpa         Makefile
>    security/gpgme       Makefile
>    security/libassuan   Makefile distinfo pkg-descr
>    security/opensc      Makefile
>  Log:
>  Update libassuan to version 2.0.1:
>
>  * Input and output notification handler can now really access the
>    parsed fd as stated in the manual.
>
>  * Cleaned up the logging.
>
>  Bump PORTREVISION and libassuan version number in related ports

-		lib/libassuan.so.0 [..]
+		lib/libassuan.so.1 [..]

Whoa, it's strange for 2.0.0 to 2.0.1. There is no ABI change from
what I can tell, right? I am pretty sure about that if you do my
suggest like in other thread and it will bring back to .so.0.

http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/2010-December/065001.html

Cheers,
Mezz


-- 
mezz.freebsd@gmail.com - mezz@FreeBSD.org
FreeBSD GNOME Team
http://www.FreeBSD.org/gnome/ - gnome@FreeBSD.org


help

Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?AANLkTik7O8aB-4ehj21NsSc0w6TAjm%2BLP4a5LOkEOqoY>