Date: Wed, 6 Jan 1999 00:01:15 +0200 From: Vallo Kallaste <vallo@matti.ee> To: Bill Fumerola <billf@chc-chimes.com> Cc: Christian Kuhtz <ck@ns1.adsu.bellsouth.com>, current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: HEADS UP: Postfix is coming. new uid, gid required. Message-ID: <19990106000115.A53948@matti.ee> In-Reply-To: <Pine.HPP.3.96.990105103502.8882B-100000@hp9000.chc-chimes.com>; from Bill Fumerola on Tue, Jan 05, 1999 at 10:35:18AM -0500 References: <19990105144139.A23264@matti.ee> <Pine.HPP.3.96.990105103502.8882B-100000@hp9000.chc-chimes.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Jan 05, 1999 at 10:35:18AM -0500, Bill Fumerola <billf@chc-chimes.com> wrote: > > > beta into a release is not a part of careful code base maintenance, IMHO. > > > If memory serves, Postfix would indeed be the only thing in /usr/src/contrib > > > which is beta. > > > > Isn't softupdates under /usr/src/contrib/sys/softupdates still beta ? > > Am I misunderstanding something ? > > No. It's just restricted how we redistribute it. Yes I know it's under contrib because of licensing restrictions (as anybody can read off the LINT). My main question is is softupdates considered stable ? Vallo Kallaste vallo@matti.ee To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19990106000115.A53948>