Date: Thu, 17 May 2012 02:43:21 +0300 From: George Kontostanos <gkontos.mail@gmail.com> To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Mirror of Raidz for data reliability Message-ID: <CA%2BdUSyrG-RFFjchEYfovbvORVBZNHes9r9MhhGG1d568cO-CwA@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <CAOfEmZiTkr9Xcj6J4FRBd4FzL1ztgEpytSAUc=wZ8DBJtXsH%2Bg@mail.gmail.com> References: <CAOfEmZh8v5xbQqkJJ7ZKkan7Ho0FPNrXJ95S1WRpioDXVG6P7w@mail.gmail.com> <20120515102206.GA53750@psconsult.nl> <CAOfEmZiTkr9Xcj6J4FRBd4FzL1ztgEpytSAUc=wZ8DBJtXsH%2Bg@mail.gmail.com>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 2:55 PM, Marcelo Araujo <araujobsdport@gmail.com> wrote: > 2012/5/15 Paul Schenkeveld <freebsd@psconsult.nl> > >> On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 01:35:51AM +0800, Marcelo Araujo wrote: >> > Hi All, >> > >> > Me and a co-work are working in a new feature for ZFS, we have 2 Machines >> > and 2 JBOD, every Machine are connected on those JBOD via SAS and we are >> > trying to make a fail-over server. Currently every each Machine has two >> SAS >> > cables, each one connected in both JBOD. >> > >> > We have worked last week to figure out, how we could make the data be >> > always alive in case one JBOD dies, and let me show you my console output >> > ;): >> > >> > controllerA# zpool status -v araujo >> > pool: araujo >> > state: ONLINE >> > scan: resilvered 57K in 0h0m with 0 errors on Sat May 12 14:32:29 2012 >> > config: >> > >> > NAME STATE READ WRITE CKSUM >> > araujo ONLINE 0 0 0 >> > raidz1-0 ONLINE 0 0 0 >> > mirror-0 ONLINE 0 0 0 >> > da0 ONLINE 0 0 0 >> > da3 ONLINE 0 0 0 >> > mirror-1 ONLINE 0 0 0 >> > da1 ONLINE 0 0 0 >> > da4 ONLINE 0 0 0 >> > mirror-2 ONLINE 0 0 0 >> > da2 ONLINE 0 0 0 >> > da5 ONLINE 0 0 0 >> > >> >> Maybe a dumb question, how you you create the above setup? I seem unable >> to create a raidz consisting of mirrors neither can I attach a second >> physical drive to an existing one in a raidz of three single drives: >> >> # zpool create tank raidz1 mirror /dev/da0 /dev/da3 mirror /dev/da1 >> /dev/da4 mirror /dev/da2 /dev/da5 >> invalid vdev specification: raidz1 requires at least 2 devices >> >> # zpool create tank raidz1 /dev/da0 /dev/da1 /dev/da2 >> # zpool attach tank /dev/da0 /dev/da3 >> cannot attach /dev/da3 to /dev/da0: can only attach to mirrors and >> top-level disks >> >> # zpool upgrade >> This system is currently running ZFS pool version 28. >> >> All pools are formatted using this version. >> >> Kind regards, >> >> Paul Schenkeveld >> > > Hey Paul, > > Yes, I'm using the latest version with code modification, it might be a new > feature. > The currently ZFS doesn't support this kind of set, that was I ask, if > there is another way that I supposed to don't know and could do the same > thing. > > If it make sense, maybe, I'll put more effort to bring this kind of stuff > as a new feature. However, it is not so simple that I could made in few > days as well as have this feature only on FreeBSD, it will make the code > inconsistent between our ZFS port and Illumos-gate. > > But is interesting. > > Best Regards, > -- > Marcelo Araujo > araujo@FreeBSD.org > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-fs@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-fs > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-fs-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" If you have 2 machines then your best bet would be HAST. If you are worried about data replication you can always use lagg with 2 or more interfaces. -- George Kontostanos Aicom telecoms ltd http://www.aisecure.nethelp
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CA%2BdUSyrG-RFFjchEYfovbvORVBZNHes9r9MhhGG1d568cO-CwA>