Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2008 14:51:35 +0100 From: Alexander Leidinger <Alexander@Leidinger.net> To: Tijl Coosemans <tijl@ulyssis.org> Cc: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Subject: Re: What is the recommended LinuxEmulator and kernel that will run skype-devel and maybe Flash9 Message-ID: <20080317145135.jn2v521ygoo48kk4@webmail.leidinger.net> In-Reply-To: <200803161550.57851.tijl@ulyssis.org> References: <20080315080424.13561oymhrersh8g@intranet.encontacto.net> <20080316102336.GA44640@freebsd.org> <20080316140618.1532db62@deskjail> <200803161550.57851.tijl@ulyssis.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Quoting Tijl Coosemans <tijl@ulyssis.org> (from Sun, 16 Mar 2008 =20 15:50:56 +0100): > On Sunday 16 March 2008 14:06:18 Alexander Leidinger wrote: >> Quoting Roman Divacky <rdivacky@freebsd.org> (Sun, 16 Mar 2008 =20 >> 11:23:36 +0100): >>> On Sun, Mar 16, 2008 at 09:50:23AM +0100, Alexander Leidinger wrote: >>>> 2.4.20 expects the NPTL in the kernel, but our kernel only activates >>> >>> I seriously doubt that... NPTL is 2.6 stuff >> >> Wasn't 2.4.20 the backport of the NPTL stuff from RedHat? Or do I mix >> this with futexes or something else? > > Both NPTL and futexes I think. I found a short overview at > http://kernelslacker.livejournal.com/85039.html Nice and interesting list there... in case someone stumbles about a =20 list of syscalls which changed from one linux kernel version to =20 another, I would be interested. > It isn't really necessary to support this imho. That's basically what is behind my "either use 2.4.2 or 2.6.16". Bye, Alexander. --=20 Machines that have broken down will work perfectly when the repairman arrives. http://www.Leidinger.net Alexander @ Leidinger.net: PGP ID =3D B0063FE7 http://www.FreeBSD.org netchild @ FreeBSD.org : PGP ID =3D 72077137
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20080317145135.jn2v521ygoo48kk4>