Date: Wed, 02 Jul 2014 19:07:39 +0200 (CEST) From: sthaug@nethelp.no To: jeffrey.e.pieper@intel.com Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org, gondim@bsdinfo.com.br Subject: Re: Network Intel X520-SR2 stopping Message-ID: <20140702.190739.74686622.sthaug@nethelp.no> In-Reply-To: <2A35EA60C3C77D438915767F458D65687E8F859E@ORSMSX111.amr.corp.intel.com> References: <CAFOYbcni9NT4eVS53-EB4yP4NO2wbhd9FCTmB=QaqPVjZsNjwQ@mail.gmail.com> <53B3F1B6.9010606@bsdinfo.com.br> <2A35EA60C3C77D438915767F458D65687E8F859E@ORSMSX111.amr.corp.intel.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> Is there any way that you can try a reproduce this using a B2B configuration, or something that doesn't use XFP as a link partner? I'm thinking that you are correct regarding an incompatibility issue between SFP+ and XFP. Why do you believe that? The optical signals are the same for SFP+ and XFP. We have lots of 10G SFP+ / XFP links in production. It just works... Steinar Haug, Nethelp consulting, sthaug@nethelp.no
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20140702.190739.74686622.sthaug>