Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2001 23:01:44 +0000 (GMT) From: "E.B. Dreger" <eddy+public+spam@noc.everquick.net> To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: question: aio / nbio / kqueue Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.20.0106222258500.12615-100000@www.everquick.net>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Quick question, hopefully not too basic for this list: AIO vs. non-blocking IO vs. kernel queues I'm familiar with (and *love*) kernel queues. Non-blocking IO is straightforward. AIO seems simple enough. My question is, from a performance standpoint, in what situations are these techniques most appropriate? TIA, Eddy --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Brotsman & Dreger, Inc. EverQuick Internet Division Phone: +1 (316) 794-8922 Wichita/(Inter)national Phone: +1 (785) 865-5885 Lawrence --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Date: Mon, 21 May 2001 11:23:58 +0000 (GMT) From: A Trap <blacklist@brics.com> To: blacklist@brics.com Subject: Please ignore this portion of my mail signature. These last few lines are a trap for address-harvesting spambots. Do NOT send mail to <blacklist@brics.com>, or you are likely to be blocked. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.LNX.4.20.0106222258500.12615-100000>