Date: Sat, 28 Jul 2007 14:36:01 +0200 From: Jan Henrik Sylvester <me@janh.de> To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Cc: ade@freebsd.org Subject: failure: portupgrade -f 'autoconf*' 'automake*' Message-ID: <46AB3831.60301@janh.de> References: 46AB1480.6000602@janh.de
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Ade wrote:
> On Jul 28, 2007, at 03:03 , Jan Henrik Sylvester wrote:
> > I think, there should be a '-' in front of every ${BUILD_VERSION}.
> >
> > Additionally to the one at --program-suffix, there are three more
> > missing.
>
> The appropriate fix has already been committed. Given the very small
> window of things being broken, I'm not planning on bumping PORTREVISION.
You only fixed the --program-suffix=-${BUILD_VERSION}.
Was I wrong that in contrast to 259, in 261 there should not be a '-' in
front of the 3 ${BUILD_VERSION} in post-patch?
From 259 (rev=1.65):
post-patch:
@(cd ${WRKSRC} && ${REINPLACE_CMD} -E
's,(PACKAGE=autoconf),\1-${BUILD_VERSION},' configure)
@(cd ${WRKSRC}/man && \
for file in *.[1x]; do \
${REINPLACE_CMD} -E
's,([^-]auto)(conf|make|reconf|update|header|scan),\1\2-${BUILD_VERSION},g
; \
s,(config\.guess|config\.sub|ifnames),\1-${BUILD_VERSION},g'
$$file ; \
done)
From 261 (rev=1.69):
post-patch:
@(cd ${WRKSRC} && ${REINPLACE_CMD} -E
's,(PACKAGE=autoconf),\1${BUILD_VERSION},' configure)
@(cd ${WRKSRC}/man && \
for file in *.[1x]; do \
${REINPLACE_CMD} -E
's,([^-]auto)(conf|make|reconf|update|header|scan),\1\2${BUILD_VERSION},g
; \
s,(config\.guess|config\.sub|ifnames),\1${BUILD_VERSION},g' $$file ; \
done)
Just wondering,
Jan Henrik
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?46AB3831.60301>