Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2003 08:37:29 +0100 From: Miguel Mendez <flynn@energyhq.es.eu.org> To: Scott Long <scottl@freebsd.org> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 40% slowdown with dynamic /bin/sh Message-ID: <20031125083729.07e51574.flynn@energyhq.es.eu.org> In-Reply-To: <20031124202408.Y69870@pooker.samsco.home> References: <20031125025621.453732A8FC@canning.wemm.org> <200311250311.hAP3BTCO075916@apollo.backplane.com> <20031124202408.Y69870@pooker.samsco.home>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
./Scott Long wrote: Please, read : http://www.netmeister.org/news/learn2quote.html > Also, I'm really starting to resent you using the FreeBSD mailing > lists as an advocacy channel for DragonFly. I fail to see how FreeBSD > 4.x and DFBSD relate to FreeBSD 5-current, which is the overall topic > of this mailing list at the moment. This comment is so ridiculous I can't resist. He has explained a very clever and nice solution for the problem, rather than bitching about it which is what the 95% of the thread is about. By bashing him, not only you're doing a great job for inter-camp relations, you're making the absurd assumption that such a solution (once/if it appears in DragonFly) cannot/will not be easily ported to FreeBSD. Cheers, -- Miguel Mendez <flynn@energyhq.es.eu.org> http://www.energyhq.es.eu.org PGP Key: 0xDC8514F1
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20031125083729.07e51574.flynn>