Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2005 10:43:17 -0400 From: "Dan Langille" <dan@langille.org> To: Gavin Atkinson <gavin.atkinson@ury.york.ac.uk> Cc: ports-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/archivers/gzip Makefile ports/archivers/ucl Makefile ports/archivers/lzop Makefile ports/archivers/cabext Message-ID: <425A54C5.27340.1795BAFF@localhost> In-Reply-To: <1113227367.35703.12.camel@buffy.york.ac.uk> References: <425A3579.2138.171B7898@localhost>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 11 Apr 2005 at 14:49, Gavin Atkinson wrote: > On Mon, 2005-04-11 at 08:29 -0400, Dan Langille wrote: > > On 11 Apr 2005 at 15:23, Ion-Mihai Tetcu wrote: > > > > > On Mon, 11 Apr 2005 08:18:16 -0400 > > > "Dan Langille" <dan@langille.org> wrote: > > > > > > > On 11 Apr 2005 at 8:04, David E. O'Brien wrote: > > > > > > > > > obrien 2005-04-11 08:04:41 UTC > > > > > > > > > > FreeBSD ports repository > > > > > > > > FreshPorts tells me that these ports were broken by this commit: > > > > > > [ ... ] > > > > > > Next time I won't bother to make a list then :) > > > > > FreshPorts does a sanity check for each port in a commit. Any > > failures are emailed to the comitter if the comitter opts in. To opt > > in, register using your @FreeBSD.org email address at > > http://www.freshports.org/ > > > > Is there any value in making sanity test failures publicly available? > > I would actually like it to email the maintainer (possibly as well as > the committer) if the maintainer has registered with FreshPorts - is > that possible? The maintainer could be easily added. > If not, making the failures public would make sense. Breakages become public later anyways... when INDEX breaks. Sanity Tests are advance notice of that. -- Dan Langille : http://www.langille.org/ BSDCan - The Technical BSD Conference - http://www.bsdcan.org/ NEW brochure available at http://www.bsdcan.org/2005/advocacy/
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?425A54C5.27340.1795BAFF>