Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2000 08:10:40 +0200 From: Mark Murray <mark@grondar.za> To: John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org> Cc: arch@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: "monotonic" counter commit candidate. Reviews, please. Message-ID: <200011210610.eAL6AiJ23116@gratis.grondar.za> In-Reply-To: <XFMail.001120142640.jhb@FreeBSD.org> ; from John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org> "Mon, 20 Nov 2000 14:26:40 PST." References: <XFMail.001120142640.jhb@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> Both machine/cpufunc.h and machine/clock.h were shot down with valid reasons. machine/systm.h also (by bde). > One could argue that this provides an MI api that is more or less a library > function. A similar function that wasn't so MD specific would be implemented > in libkern. libkern's prototypes are in sys/systm.h. The natural name for a > MD portion of sys/systm.h is machine/systm.h. There is already tons of > precedent for this. This has already been discussed to death. Its now in machine/cpu.h M -- Mark Murray Join the anti-SPAM movement: http://www.cauce.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200011210610.eAL6AiJ23116>