Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2015 10:07:59 +0200 From: Konstantin Belousov <kostikbel@gmail.com> To: Henry Hu <henry.hu.sh@gmail.com> Cc: "O. Hartmann" <ohartman@zedat.fu-berlin.de>, FreeBSD CURRENT <freebsd-current@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Shared object "libelf.so.2" not found, required by "libkvm.so.6" Message-ID: <20151130080759.GG3448@kib.kiev.ua> In-Reply-To: <CAEJt7hb_45a-XOddf8QLWcLpYLTKvB65Ci2O928wPrTvJTo0%2BQ@mail.gmail.com> References: <20151129210725.7baf95ee.ohartman@zedat.fu-berlin.de> <CAEJt7hb_45a-XOddf8QLWcLpYLTKvB65Ci2O928wPrTvJTo0%2BQ@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, Nov 29, 2015 at 03:11:42PM -0500, Henry Hu wrote: > On Sun, Nov 29, 2015 at 3:07 PM, O. Hartmann <ohartman@zedat.fu-berlin.de> > wrote: > > > > > On most recent CURRENT (Revision: 291458), ob booting I receive this on > > the console: > > > > Shared object "libelf.so.2" not found, required by "libkvm.so.6" > > > > What looking at the shared object cache with ldconfig -r, I find > > libelf.so.2 as well as > > libkvm.so.6 listed. > > > > What is this weird message? > > > > > locate libelf.so.2 > ... > /usr/lib/libelf.so.2 > ... > > locate libkvm.so.6 > /lib/libkvm.so.6 > ... > > ldd /lib/libkvm.so.6 > /lib/libkvm.so.6: > libc.so.7 => /lib/libc.so.7 (0x800822000) > > It's strange that your libkvm.so.6 depends on libelf.so.2. Where does it > come from? Does the original reporter have root and /usr volumes split ? Show the 'mount' output on the affected machine.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20151130080759.GG3448>