Date: Fri, 9 Aug 2002 09:56:52 -0500 From: Dan Nelson <dnelson@allantgroup.com> To: current@FreeBSD.ORG Cc: Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au>, Mike Barcroft <mike@FreeBSD.ORG>, Andrew Kolchoogin <andrew@snark.rinet.ru> Subject: Re: Comments on Release Building for -current Message-ID: <20020809145652.GB3773@dan.emsphone.com> In-Reply-To: <20020809044652.GA12216@dragon.nuxi.com> References: <20020803123249.B70372@espresso.q9media.com> <20020804195905.O1075-100000@gamplex.bde.org> <20020809044652.GA12216@dragon.nuxi.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In the last episode (Aug 08), David O'Brien said: > On Sun, Aug 04, 2002 at 08:01:10PM +1000, Bruce Evans wrote: > > > > sorry, but some time ago I read here that gcc -O2 breaks our > > > > printf() in libc. I haven't find any assembler code in > > > > /usr/src/lib/libc/stdio/vfprintf.c, > ... > > > If someone could find the small segment of code where the > > > optimizer screws up, and write a small program to demonstrate the > > > problem, we would have a good chance of it getting fixed. > > > > Er, someone (Dan Lukes) has already done this. See PR 40209. > > It looks like this PR is against the system GCC 3.1. As such it > isn't a very interesting bug report. Someone needs to test to see if > this bug exists when using the gcc31 (gcc 3.1.1 release) port. It does. -- Dan Nelson dnelson@allantgroup.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020809145652.GB3773>