Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2005 11:48:12 -0800 From: "David O'Brien" <obrien@freebsd.org> To: Sergey Lyubka <valenok@gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: pcre in base system Message-ID: <20050217194812.GE56059@dragon.nuxi.com> In-Reply-To: <72c3a95705021711371c45952d@mail.gmail.com> References: <72c3a957050217031230598f63@mail.gmail.com> <86zmy3qmm2.wl%sf@FreeBSD.org> <72c3a957050217065223729f83@mail.gmail.com> <20050217185422.GJ57256@cirb503493.alcatel.com.au> <20050217192822.GA85506@dragon.nuxi.com> <72c3a95705021711371c45952d@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, Feb 17, 2005 at 07:37:14PM +0000, Sergey Lyubka wrote: > So it will. > If regex(3) will be decoupled from libc, one can remap > libregex to pcre, for example. > > > > greater reliance on ports. An interesting approach could be to > > > break out regex(3) from libc and allow base utilities to use shared > > > libraries from ports - this would allow someone to install the pcre > > > port and have the base sed(1) use it. > > > > Uh, no. /usr/src should be self-contained. DON'T TOP POST. -- -- David (obrien@FreeBSD.org)
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050217194812.GE56059>